data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/353a4/353a4090e7eb1318f48c7ed8f4c9e3d3e16481e3" alt=""
DarthHookah
Vested Members-
Posts
534 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
- Interests
DarthHookah's Achievements
Newbie (1/14)
0
Reputation
-
what are you talking about? Nuge is the SHIZNITE! Fucking Ted Fuckin Nugent!
-
i work in a pizza place. every now and then some of the more pleasant people from the inner city come in off of busses (literally, like 50 of them). every single one of them came up to the counter, looked at the menu behind me for a solid minute, and asked "how much is a large?" of course, id have to follow it up with "how many toppings?" it got to the point where i said "i dont know, you were the one looking at the menu." then some would get pissed that their pizza cost 30 cents more than the last guy... who bought less stuff.
-
in recognition of Valentines Day, i had an idea. for lovers, a hookah hose with two mouthpieces! what do you think of that idea?
-
of course, but you CAN compare gaming philosophies...
-
eh, you assholes can have your billion dollar video game consoles. the throne of the King Of Consoles has been usurped by the original King, Nintendo!
-
Star Wars will send you to Hell!
DarthHookah replied to DarthHookah's topic in Serious Discussion Forum
id love to have that hookah for my own... perhaps it wasnt destroyed when the Bo'mar monks took over after Jabba's death... -
well, i think what they were trying to do to saddam was to humiliate him by treating him as just another criminal. i think by blowing his execution out of purportion would be pleasing him (as much as a guy in his position could be). his execution was as low key as possible, to demean him. the message was "you're not worth the effort"
-
A Simple Idea, Save The Death Penalty!
DarthHookah replied to Sonthert's topic in Serious Discussion Forum
everyone is looking for the perfect system, but the problem is this- the system is designed and operated and populated by humans, and because of our very nature, it will not be a perfect system. unless you want it to be operated and maintained by machines, and have our lives dicated by them (some would argue that it is that way right now, but im talking on a much larger scale) we are going to have to accept imperfections. you guys keep looking for Utopia, ill be here in cincinatti (cincinnati? yes, i think cincinnati is right). -
um, well, voting is a good thing, i suppose.
-
thank you for your understanding. its been proven that 30 to 40 percent of adults feel some sort of attraction to children (compare that to the percentage of adults that actually commit). there should be something other than internet porn. also, you cant run a judicial system with emotion. it has to be cold and level headed. ruling by emotion and rage is what they did in the dark ages, and its not pretty. i understand that touching children is a heinous crime that should indeed carry punishment, but the judgement should come unbiased. protecting children should be our #1 priority, i think that the best way to protect them is to find these people who would commit before they actually do. as it is, its kind of a whack-a-mole system, and it isnt working. if people can find it in their hearts to put down their torches and pitchforks, we can come to a humane and fair solution for everyone- parents, children, and children 'lovers' alike. and steve, you are right- the term "sex offender" can be applied rather loosely. imaging going down for pissing in public, and having to drag that name with you for the rest of your life (in one state, i forget which, they are pushing legislation that would require sex offenders to wear bright orange shirts that say 'sex offender' while working).
-
no disrespect taken, i understand this is a hot topic with a lot of emotions involved. i have an unusual way oflooking at it, and i respect the fact that you feel that way to protect your kids. do keep in mind, i am referring to the pedophiles that have not yet commited, and are looking for help. once they cross that line, they're on their own. law is the law. to date, i have yet to meet a woman who is willing to share DNA with me, so i have no kids of my own. perhaps my view will change. so ill drop the whole thing. McCain is an asshole!
-
yeah, ive been on the death penalty board some too. ive been posting on these two regularly for a few days. oddly enough, i thought i was posting on the death penalty board, hence the mention of it. all i am saying is that if a person feels an attraction to children, and it causes the person distress (which it usually does), i think there should be better outlets for them to overcome their problem. curing the cold by killing the patient is just not working.
-
"We should move to the "an eye for an eye" law (LOL). You steal, guess what your right hand gets taken away." odd, this is what people were asking for when theft actually carried a dismemberment punishment. an eye for an eye means that the punishment should fit the crime. its a cry for fairness. "95% Right and you are OK with that?! You're saying that 5 out of every 100 people executed are innocent? That figure scares the hell out of me!" know whats scarier? for every 10, 000 people executed, 500 are innocent. the numbers keep going up.
-
AIDS, types of cancer, Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinsons Disease, even the common cold are all uncurable. does that mean we should just let them rot in their own disease? the DSM-IV also defines pedophilia as an attraction to children that causes the person distress, and makes it difficult for them to perform in everyday life. the attraction causes them distress, and a doctor should never turn their back on someone who is suffering. human rights apply only to humans? wow, i wish everyone was as perfect as you.... some cultures still consider women to be second class human beings. i say if the person has two legs and two arms (amputees included, of course), a face, maybe some hair and teeth, then they are worth saving. this is all i have to say on that topic. if it is a disease, then doctors should help treat it. it is certainly better for the children, instead of waiting for something to happen. definitely more proactive. ive come to the conclusion that the death penalty is bullshit- if it were truly a deterrent, then by definition we wouldnt need it (but then again, nothing says "obey me" like a bloody head on a stake). oh, for ghost, most states age of consent is about 16ish, but you still have to be 18 to be naked in pictures, liability on the photographer.
-
ok, removing nuts would definitly stop them, but it would also stop them from fiddling anybody. is it truly fair to take away from them their ability to have a meaningful relationship with an adult? and forced castration would not exactly take care of the few female offenders we have either. my take? i think with therapy a person would be able to overcome an attraction to children. problem is, the only way to get help if you ARE attracted to children is to offend, go to prison, and then be court-ordered to therapy. there needs to be someplace where they can go BEFORE they offend. that would make more sense imprisoning them if they ever do commit the crime- they had the resources available to overcome their attraction. but mental health has turned a cold shoulder to them (pedophilia was my topic in my psychology class). another important fact- not all sex offenders are "kiddy fiddlers". i had a friend who was 18 and his girlfriend was 17. perfectly reasonable relationship. but *gasp* he had naked pictures of her on his computer! he went to jail for having child pornography, and now he is a sex offender. think about that next time you get a notice in the mail about a "sex offender" moving into your neighborhood. that term can be applied very loosely. but anyway, back on track- fuck mccain!