oolatec Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 You can get the program here... http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=673When you run it, click Select Measurement, and select #1, and let it do its thing. My final score was 163,911... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt. Morgan Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 Damn I only got a 106,600. Avg. fps was 101.2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MechAnt Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 I like 3DMark06 better. It's more of a standard right now with the industry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oolatec Posted April 15, 2008 Author Share Posted April 15, 2008 QUOTE (MechAnt @ Apr 15 2008, 03:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I like 3DMark06 better. It's more of a standard right now with the industry.Nowhere did I say this would be the only Geek thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SupremeOstrich Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 (edited) First time I got 125k, then I got like 99k, this time I got 117,773.Weird O.oEDIT - Does your resolution affect your results? Because i'm running 1920x1200 Edited April 16, 2008 by SupremeOstrich Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MechAnt Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Yes resolution does affect the results A LOT. Run it at native (highest resolution your monitor can run) to get the best idea about how your computer performs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SupremeOstrich Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 QUOTE (MechAnt @ Apr 16 2008, 12:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Yes resolution does affect the results A LOT. Run it at native (highest resolution your monitor can run) to get the best idea about how your computer performs.Yeah, that's the native resolution xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canon Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 a little over 20,000 for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralleac Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 (edited) Final score was 124,494 with an average of 124.49 fps. It went to 135,000 something the second time around, though. Edited April 22, 2008 by Ralleac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoopy1966 Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 My final was around 56,000 and did not look at the fps. I have a Dell XPS 400 and I thought it was a good machine. I guess not, it is only 2 years old. I should test my new lappy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oolatec Posted April 17, 2008 Author Share Posted April 17, 2008 QUOTE (Snoopy1966 @ Apr 17 2008, 10:32 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>My final was around 56,000 and did not look at the fps. I have a Dell XPS 400 and I thought it was a good machine. I guess not, it is only 2 years old. I should test my new lappy.So you averaged 56 FPS... it's not THAT bad. Curious about your lappy though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canon Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 should i get a better videocard and more ram?currently i have geforce 7300 and 2 gigs of ram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oolatec Posted April 17, 2008 Author Share Posted April 17, 2008 QUOTE (Canon @ Apr 17 2008, 04:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>should i get a better videocard and more ram?currently i have geforce 7300 and 2 gigs of ramWhat CPU do you have?Re: your question... Well, does your box do what you need it to do well enough? If not, then it'd be time to upgrade. At least that's how I decide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canon Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 Intel pentium 4 3.2 GHzwindos XP SP280 gigs of memory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oolatec Posted April 18, 2008 Author Share Posted April 18, 2008 QUOTE (Canon @ Apr 17 2008, 05:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Intel pentium 4 3.2 GHzwindos XP SP280 gigs of memoryWell, if it works for you, it's all good! The P4 is a bit long in the tooth... but don't listen to me. I'm one of those bleeding-edge types. If you were to update, best bet would be a Core 2 Duo to replace the P4... but you'd need a new motherboard because the socket types are different... the C2D uses Intel's latest LGA 775 socket. If you were a big gamer, I'd say it was worth it... but if you just make hookah videos, email, and post here, what you have now is more than adequate... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SupremeOstrich Posted April 18, 2008 Share Posted April 18, 2008 Yeah, if you're going to game i'd at least upgrade the processor. But if you're going to do that, you'll probably be upgrading your motherboard, which might mean upgrading your RAM too xDBut yeah dude, that's only if you're into gaming =/I'm running a core2quad. If only I could get this stupid MSI motherboard to overclock it properly =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oolatec Posted April 18, 2008 Author Share Posted April 18, 2008 QUOTE (SupremeOstrich @ Apr 17 2008, 09:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Yeah, if you're going to game i'd at least upgrade the processor. But if you're going to do that, you'll probably be upgrading your motherboard, which might mean upgrading your RAM too xDBut yeah dude, that's only if you're into gaming =/I'm running a core2quad. If only I could get this stupid MSI motherboard to overclock it properly =/+1 indeed.Bummer with the MSI/Core 2 Quad combo. I have the Q6600 and the eVGA 780i, running the CPU at 3.6Ghz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victim026 Posted April 18, 2008 Share Posted April 18, 2008 Man I needa get a new computer for Counter Strike and Day Of Defeat, my scores suck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralleac Posted April 18, 2008 Share Posted April 18, 2008 QUOTE (oolatec @ Apr 17 2008, 06:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>QUOTE (SupremeOstrich @ Apr 17 2008, 09:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Yeah, if you're going to game i'd at least upgrade the processor. But if you're going to do that, you'll probably be upgrading your motherboard, which might mean upgrading your RAM too xDBut yeah dude, that's only if you're into gaming =/I'm running a core2quad. If only I could get this stupid MSI motherboard to overclock it properly =/+1 indeed.Bummer with the MSI/Core 2 Quad combo. I have the Q6600 and the eVGA 780i, running the CPU at 3.6Ghz. That help much? I haven't bother overclocking mine for fear of screwing something up. I'm running the same processor and board, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oolatec Posted April 18, 2008 Author Share Posted April 18, 2008 QUOTE (Ralleac @ Apr 18 2008, 02:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>QUOTE (oolatec @ Apr 17 2008, 06:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>QUOTE (SupremeOstrich @ Apr 17 2008, 09:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Yeah, if you're going to game i'd at least upgrade the processor. But if you're going to do that, you'll probably be upgrading your motherboard, which might mean upgrading your RAM too xDBut yeah dude, that's only if you're into gaming =/I'm running a core2quad. If only I could get this stupid MSI motherboard to overclock it properly =/+1 indeed.Bummer with the MSI/Core 2 Quad combo. I have the Q6600 and the eVGA 780i, running the CPU at 3.6Ghz. That help much? I haven't bother overclocking mine for fear of screwing something up. I'm running the same processor and board, though.Sure does! Depends on the brand/kind of RAM too... if it can handle higher speeds. Here's a guide:http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2226883.2Ghz is actually more stable than 3.6Ghz for me... but oh well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoopy1966 Posted April 18, 2008 Share Posted April 18, 2008 My XPS desktop has 2GB of RAM 3.00 GHz Pentium D Windows XPXPS Lappy has 4 GB of RAM 2.2 Ghz Intel Duo Core T7500 Vista Home Premium Red Version Here are the lappy results.94,528 average fps 94.53 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oolatec Posted April 18, 2008 Author Share Posted April 18, 2008 QUOTE (Snoopy1966 @ Apr 18 2008, 08:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>My XPS desktop has 2GB of RAM 3.00 GHz Pentium D Windows XPXPS Lappy has 4 GB of RAM 2.2 Ghz Intel Duo Core T7500 Vista Home Premium Red Version Here are the lappy results.94,528 average fps 94.53Ah nice... the Core 2 Duo is a damn nice chip! Hope my brother that works for AMD isn't reading this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mathuv Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 138,923 with 139 fps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oolatec Posted April 21, 2008 Author Share Posted April 21, 2008 QUOTE (mathuv @ Apr 21 2008, 07:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>138,923 with 139 fps Nice!!! What's under the hood? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoopy1966 Posted April 21, 2008 Share Posted April 21, 2008 Barely 20,000 on my 4 year old desktop. Pentium 4 Processor 3.00 Ghz ATI 9800 Radeon That really sucks... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now