pavlakos_politakos Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 just continuing a small debate with mushrat.feel free to contribute.so...i think bigger is better when it comes to hookah because the smoke has more time to cool and lose some of the bad sh*t on the way down.mush says the opposite.he says the smoke gets stale(loses flavor?).i dont wanna turn this into a feud so no side picking please,just express your opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishdog Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 I dont nessicarrily think bigger is better just because heat rises...i dont know if the smoke in the chamber does anythign different from that of the outside world but...yeah i would Imagine the heat would rise to the top of the base so the cooler air would technically be near the water while the hotter would rise...not sure to tell ya the truth but thats my 2 cents Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dizzing Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 that's actually a really good point. although once you hit the thing, all the smoke in the chamber ends up coming out anyway. all i know is, on my current hookah when i had a longer stem and the smoke chamber was larger it hit much harsher and with less flavor. pipe length really seems like it could contribute to the cooling, but the water does a whole lot more than any stem.. plus at that stage the smoke is condensed by the pressure of the water. then, in the hose the smoke travels far further than it would in the stem anyway, getting even cooler. the difference is probably moot as far as stem length goes, the only real factor seems to be smoke chamber size. and as far as i can tell larger is definitely not better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yashman19 Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 I've never noticed any difference in harshness, flavor or lack thereof between my 18" egyptian and my 36" egyptian, but I did notice that I get much thicker smoke out of the big boy. Good luck finding a solid answer on this topic, as everyone seems to have different views and experiences with their hookahs. Just thought I would add my own 2cents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pavlakos_politakos Posted February 10, 2006 Author Share Posted February 10, 2006 well you all add good points but we yet to see mush coontribute his 2 cents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coldfire22x Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 it seems like there's too many variables to really do a side by side comparison ... are the bowls packed exactly the same? same sized holes and placement in the foil? coals burning the same temperature, etc.? are you taking draws at the same volume and rate? :Pand on top of it all, isn't the "harshness," etc., largely subjective? i mean, to a point .. you can definitely tell. but once it gets close, who has the most accurate back of their throat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mushrat Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 PP: you've seen my 2 cents..its what STARTED all of this in the other thread remember? Of course it's subjective coldfire.... All we can really do is collect people's prefrences and anyone who is wondering can decide for themselves... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yashman19 Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 [quote name='coldfire22x']it seems like there's too many variables to really do a side by side comparison ... are the bowls packed exactly the same? same sized holes and placement in the foil? coals burning the same temperature, etc.? are you taking draws at the same volume and rate? :Pand on top of it all, isn't the "harshness," etc., largely subjective? i mean, to a point .. you can definitely tell. but once it gets close, who has the most accurate back of their throat [/quote] Also, some downstems have a much wider diameter than other stems, which allows for a lot more air-flow to get through. This could affect the way the bowl burns, because you are able to pull way more smoke through than if the stem was narrower. You are definately correct coldfire. There are too many thigns which can effect the way a hookah smokes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny_Z Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 I've always been of the mindset that the perfect smoke can be found in the middle ground between big and small. I think theres a downside to both large hookahs and small hookahs and what it really comes down to is personal preference. With smaller hookahs (20" and under) I think the flavor is often stronger because the smoke doesnt have to travel such a long way, as smoke is prone to losing a bit of it's punch as travels. The smoke also seems to stay colder in small hookah which I find to be very satisfying. Small hookahs also tend to be much easier to draw the smoke through and generally don't clog as much. Because of their size, small hookahs are naturally quite portable and easy to take wherever you may go. Many of them come with carrying cases as well. The downside of small hookahs? Because the smoke doesnt travel so far and has less water to filter through it rarely ever becomes as thick as the smoke you'll get from a medium or large hookah. You can get it really thick by loading on the coal, but at that point you really run the risk of burning the ma'assell. Some small hookahs can also be prone to tipping over if the base wasn't blown just right. And then theres large hookahs (30" and over in my book)... With large hookahs you'll usually get a smoke that is much thicker then normal and is really well filtered. But I think there are more downsides to large hookahs then there is upsides. With a large hookah the smoke can often lose much of it's flavor from having to travel so far and can become harsh quite bit easier as well. Another downside is that large hookahs often require quite a bit of lung power to pull the smoke through such a large chamber. And if the base isnt really well built, large hookahs can be much more prone to tipping over then a small one would... and coal burns on your carpet just arn't cool! And finally I come to my favorite size of hookah... the medium ones! I consider a medium hookah to be ones that range about 24" to 26" tall. With a medium hookah I tend to get a flavor thats almost as strong as what I would get from a smaller hookah, but with the thickness of smoke I might get from a larger one. The smoke doesnt have to travel too far so it stays fairly cold and the lung power required to draw a puff is increased only slightly over what I would get from a small hookah, which is actually a good thing in my book. I like having to "tug" a little bit for my smoke. I've also found medium hookahs to be more stable and tip less easily. And while not as portable as small hookahs, many medium hookahs come with travel bags or cases and arn't too difficult to take places (just don't go trying to fit them in the top case on the back of your motorcycle ) The only downsides I've found with medium sized hookahs is that they do take a little bit longer to clean then small ones, and can occasionally clog like their larger brethren. All in all I'd say I really like small hookahs for the ease of travel, quick setup time, and generally good flavorful smoke. I never cared for the larger hookahs as they always seemed to be kind of a pain to setup and never really gave me quite as good of a smoke as the smaller ones. But my favorite hookahs are truely the medium sized ones that provide me the most of the good aspects of small and large hookahs and few of the negatives. Like the Buddha, I have found my path in the middle ground Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
methodical13 Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 [quote name='Yashman19']I've never noticed any difference in harshness, flavor or lack thereof between my 18" egyptian and my 36" egyptian, but I did notice that I get much thicker smoke out of the big boy.Good luck finding a solid answer on this topic, as everyone seems to have different views and experiences with their hookahs. Just thought I would add my own 2cents.[/quote] I think you got it right on there...the only difference I've noticed is I get a lot thicker smoke with the larger hookah, bu other than that I don't think there's much of a difference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pavlakos_politakos Posted February 10, 2006 Author Share Posted February 10, 2006 wow! who knew such a small question could have so many answers? i see everyones point and i guess it is just a matter of preferance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HookahCaterpillar Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 My theory is this... The smaller the vase the less room for smoke to fill up. So the smoke gets harsh because of it. Also the less water the less time it takes for the water to get all nasty which causes harshness and an off taste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dizzing Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 [quote name='HookahCaterpillar']The smaller the vase the less room for smoke to fill up. So the smoke gets harsh because of it.[/quote]sorry, i don't follow your logic...? Why does it get harsh because of that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HookahCaterpillar Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 sorry that didnt come out right, what i meant was the smaller the vase the less water. The less water the faster the water gets all nasty. The bigger the vase the more water and it can handle more shisha and stuff that gets in the water. I have noticed that when the water turns yellow from the smoke and stuff it makes it harsh. The water gets yellow alot faster with a less amount of water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dizzing Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 ah... yeah, excellent point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[LB] Posted February 11, 2006 Share Posted February 11, 2006 no caterpillar i think you were right the first time it just needs to be explained- harshness can be a result of the tobacco burning too fast- and you know what happens when that happens- seroius smoke density. If the smoke is way too dense because its one of those little vases it could get harsher- maybe my science is wrong TANG! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[LB] Posted February 11, 2006 Share Posted February 11, 2006 sh*t also when you pull in on a large vase your taking smoke that was there before as well, thats gonna help cool it down- imagine hooking up the hose right to the pipe directly without crossing through the vase- That would be rough and hot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HookahCaterpillar Posted February 11, 2006 Share Posted February 11, 2006 Now heres another question for debate... What if you had a small stem but a big vase? For instance taking a baby junior hookah's stem and putting into an egyptian style large vase? My theory is it wouldnt be harsh at all. I dont know if it would fit in a big vase but if it were modified in a way that the stem was long enough and it could fit what is your opinion guys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[LB] Posted February 11, 2006 Share Posted February 11, 2006 na the farther the smoke travels along the pipe the more time it has to cool. You have to think about the extremes, what if you put the bowl directly on the vase and just hit it- youd get some pretty harsh smoke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonthert Posted February 11, 2006 Share Posted February 11, 2006 Here comes Tangiers!His wizened and educated answer will enlighten everybody!Thank you, thank you! You're really special, thanks much. This question first bothered me in 1998. So, I went to, what were the greatest minds of hookah at the time. I asked them and 50% said smaller was better and 50% said larger was better. So I decided to pursue this investigation MYSELF! I have studied the mass transfer aspects, the thermal transfer aspects, the thermochemical implications, the physics, the fluid mechanics, the organic chemistry and the separation implications. I looked into industrial equipment that has a similar function, like cooling towers, and looked at the ramifications that their engineering could potentially have on the question. After seven years of study and thought, I have come to a conclusion: I have no idea.I think you're all right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dizzing Posted February 11, 2006 Share Posted February 11, 2006 hahahahahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now