Balthazar Posted October 5, 2009 Share Posted October 5, 2009 http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qi...03185958AA7IWtOhttp://www.digital-slr-guide.com/digital-slr-anti-shake.htmlLawl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chinamon Posted October 5, 2009 Share Posted October 5, 2009 QUOTE (gaia.plateau @ Oct 5 2009, 08:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>is there a disadvantage to using IS?some will say yes and some will say no.i know my next lens will have IS. its not a necessity but it is a good feature to have if you can afford the extra price tag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScotsman Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 QUOTE (gaia.plateau @ Oct 5 2009, 03:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>is there a disadvantage to using IS?Lens based IS is great in a long lens. Gotta be nice to them though, they are delicate. All in all, if you are planning on any tele sIt adds a bit of delay. There are really two types of IS, it is either in the body or the lens. The lens-based IS will help when shooting with a long lens, and an optical viewfinder. Personally, I don't like digital IS, it's just glorified pixel tracking software. Shooting without support, especially at a low ISO some form of stabilization is a must. For action shooting, especially under, well, less than ideal conditions, you want some form of IS. Play with a few of both and see what you like.Agree on the nikon feel, I like canon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now