Jump to content

How Are Al Fakher Coconut Coals?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Use an electric coil stove or a gas stove to light them. The hotplate or glass stoves dont work too well and you may or may not crack the glass stoves if you light the coals on there.

If you use gas try to find a metal grate to put the coals on as they light better that way.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I see little difference between AF Nats, CHs and Cocos. I think some people just like to spend more money and say they smoke Cocos. Who knows?

All I know is I've smoked all three and the only differences I noticed was that Cocos and CHs are all 100% uniform in size while AF's vary slightly coal to coal, and Coco's produce finer ash. (Believe it or not, I think CHs produce the most course ash with AFs somewhere in the middle.) While coal uniformity and ash consistency may be deciding factors to some people (maybe?), I could care less. I just want a coal that burns hot, lasts a while, has no taste, and is easy on the wallet. Therefore, both AF Nats and CH's make me smile. smile.gif

By the way, we use AF Nats at our lounge and have no problems whatsoever. Some of the best coals I've found, and they won't break the bank.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My oppinion is that AF coals suck donkey balls. They are not even close to a CH or Coco. The shape is a effed up and some last 40 min while other last 20 min. I rather buy a box of exoticas for $5..

That is all....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (fcbayern @ Oct 5 2009, 07:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
My oppinion is that AF coals suck donkey balls. They are not even close to a CH or Coco. The shape is a effed up and some last 40 min while other last 20 min. I rather buy a box of exoticas for $5..

That is all....



Meh, I've gone through several thousand of those coals and never noticed a problem like that. Although, they are sized slightly differently - not enough to effect the burn time by that much, though. Maybe you got a bad batch?

I'd like to buy a small quantity of Coco's and CH's to officially test them. I'll see if I can get it done in the next couple of weeks and report back. I'm all curious now. smile.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tryed my first box of AF Coconut coals, they were ok to be exact.... not as good as coconaras, mostly because the inconsistant size, there were alot that were HUGE then some half the size, like wtf?!?! but to start, it had a funny taste to them, as they started to ash it went away and i got a smoother smoke, great amount of heat but thats about it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
the thickness of the ash is a big one for me. Reasoning is because with CH coals you are forced to ash them b/c the thick ash sticks to the coals.

with cocos it is thin and very little ash, so you drop the coals on the bowl, and thats it, never have to touch or ash them again. The ash falls right off on its own whereas the CH, have to be ashed somewhat often or you lose a lot of heat. (I hate ashing coals, it's just easier not to have to)

Also cocos burn longer.

I find it humerous that many always wanna say oh, you buy it because it costs more. For some that may be true, but not for many.

Cocos can be had for cheap if you know where to buy and buy in bulk. 84 cocos produces more hours of smoking than 132 CH coals.

The amount of coal shouldn't be considered really, it is the amount of time they produce legit flavorless heat that should matter.

As to the OP, i have been told for the money, AF coals are really good, but don't compare to CH/Cocos

QUOTE (ih303 @ Oct 5 2009, 08:26 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Honestly, I see little difference between AF Nats, CHs and Cocos. I think some people just like to spend more money and say they smoke Cocos. Who knows?

All I know is I've smoked all three and the only differences I noticed was that Cocos and CHs are all 100% uniform in size while AF's vary slightly coal to coal, and Coco's produce finer ash. (Believe it or not, I think CHs produce the most course ash with AFs somewhere in the middle.) While coal uniformity and ash consistency may be deciding factors to some people (maybe?), I could care less. I just want a coal that burns hot, lasts a while, has no taste, and is easy on the wallet. Therefore, both AF Nats and CH's make me smile. smile.gif

By the way, we use AF Nats at our lounge and have no problems whatsoever. Some of the best coals I've found, and they won't break the bank.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are okay, they aren't the best coconut coals out there, but you can spend less on them to try since they come in smaller sizes, 60 and 30. They aren't the best, but i would pick them over quicklights though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I just tried 3K coals for the first time today. I don't know how people use those. First, you can scarcely ash them because they try to fall apart every time you grab them with the tongs. Second, they seriously only lasted for like twenty minutes tops. Are goldens better?

Keep in mind, I've only ever used naturals. That's where my opinion is based.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (ih303 @ Oct 22 2009, 02:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wow, I just tried 3K coals for the first time today. I don't know how people use those. First, you can scarcely ash them because they try to fall apart every time you grab them with the tongs. Second, they seriously only lasted for like twenty minutes tops. Are goldens better?

Keep in mind, I've only ever used naturals. That's where my opinion is based.



It's kind of a split, half would say Golden's are Better, half would say 3 Kings.

I prefer Golden's over the 2. But it's been a while since I have any so things may have switched around.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i absolutely love my AF coconut coals...so much so that i bought the 720ct box and may buy another one just to have on hand...

here's my review: http://www.hookahforum.com/index.php?s=&am...st&p=416997

however, i wanted to make some amendments to my review, but haven't gotten around to it yet.

1. the length of these coals seem to be really good as long as you don't take 10 pulls in 30 seconds, like i normally do. i've had them last longer than one episode of Sons of Anarchy (~1hr)

2. i can't really detect a taste from the coals, but i'm still not positive. maybe there's a "smokey" taste, but then again i do smoke cigs and tend to heat my bowl on the hotter side (not enough to burn it, but right at the limit)

3. the "chips" and sparks aren't coming off the coals that HJ sent me. the ones that Mahir sent still spark up a bit and chip on the inhales...i think this has to do more with how they were handled during shipping though...

either way, for the money you spend...i think the AF coals are a steal and pretty damn good. they have somewhat replaced my beloved canarys. i may still break out the canarys for long-haul smoke sessions...but, the 1-2 hours sessions call for the AF cocos.

however, i do think coconaras are a better coal - but you do pay a higher price. but the benefits of the coconaras don't justify the higher price... Edited by Arcane
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (NIGHTS OF BAGHDAD @ Oct 22 2009, 02:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE (Stuie @ Oct 22 2009, 02:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE (Arcane @ Oct 22 2009, 02:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i absolutely love my AF coconut coals...so much so that i bought the 720ct box and ....


720?!?!??! Where?

http://www.hookahjohn.com/product.sc?produ...mp;categoryId=6

wink.gif where else



You know, that's a really stinking good price for them. 7 cents a coal... Why the heck not!!!!!!!!!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...